Environmental Ethics
and Public Policy
Ernest Partridge, Ph.D

HOME PAGE                             
    Philosophy and Religion
    Ethics, Moral Issues, the Law
    The Environment

On Politics
    The Crisis
    Foreign Relations, War, Peace
    The Media
    The Elections
    Civil Liberties and Dissent
    Republicans & the Right
    Democrats & the Left
    Lies, Propaganda & Corruption
    Culture War & Religious Right
    Coup d'Etat, 2000

Published Papers

Unpublished Papers

Reviews, Lectures, etc.    

Internet Publications


Lecture Topics

Conscience of a Progressive
    (A Book in Progress)

A Dim View of Libertarianism

Rawls and the Duty to Posterity
    (Doctoral Dissertation)

The Ecology Project

For Environmental Educators

The Russian Environment

    (Critiques of Post Modernism)

Notes from the Brink
    (Peace Studies)

The Gadfly's Bio Sketch

The Gadfly's Publications

The Online Gadfly: Editorial Policy

The Gadfly's E-Mail: gadfly@igc.org

Classical Guitar:
"The Other Profession




The Gadfly Bytes -- October 24, 2006

Why Won't the Progressives
Get Their Act Together?


Ernest Partridge, Co-Editor
The Crisis Papers

It seems sometimes that the wealthy progressives don’t really want to win or, at the very least, don’t care to learn how to win.

Case in point: Air America Radio.

As most of you have surely heard, two weeks ago Air America Radio filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Not, as the right-wing commentariat would have us believe, because of poor ratings or lack of listener support.  To be sure, poor management was largely responsible for AAR’s troubles.  But the crucial difficulty, I suspect, was a lack of long-term capitalization, which is to say, investment by deep-pocketed liberal supporters.

Air America Radio is a business, as is FOX News, The Washington Times, and other right-wing media enterprises.  Like most businesses, AAR is expected to turn a profit, if not at the outset, then at least eventually, after some "settling in."  Absent a reasonable expectation of profit and return on investment, a business fails.

But Rev.  Moon’s Washington Times and Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, to name just two right-wing media enterprises, are not “like most businesses.” Their primary objective is not profit, it is propaganda.  And so, year after year, even though these “businesses” routinely lose millions of dollars with no prospect of profits in sight, there is no reason to expect that they will declare bankruptcy.  As long as they accomplish their primary objective of befuddling a sizeable portion of the American public, they will stay in business.  Moon, Murdoch, et al, can absorb the losses without breaking a sweat.

Moon, Murdoch, and other right-wing fat-cats keep their red-ink media operations going for the same reason that Scaife, Coors, Ahmanson, and numerous corporations fund such so-called “think tanks” as The American Enterprise Institute, The Heritage Foundation, The Competitive Enterprise Institute, etc.  They do so to promote their agenda, and they have been spectacularly successful in doing so.

The benefactors of these media and think-tanks do not expect direct compensation for these “investments.” But their indirect returns have been enormous.  For this massive propaganda effort has been instrumental in putting the regressive Bush administration and the rubber-stamp Republican Congress in power, from which has issued tax cuts, deregulation, no-bid contracts, while at the same time crippling labor unions and endangering the middle class.

Meanwhile, Air America Radio is on its own, as it scrounges for corporate (!) sponsors.

Super-rich progressives, such as George Soros, Warren Buffet, and those fabled “Hollywood liberals” have, qua rich, made out like bandits with the Bush tax cuts, even while they have steadfastly opposed Bushism.

So why can’t they put some of that windfall into a progressive (and permanently cash-bleeding) media?  Soros, for example, has commendably donated billions to “promote democracy” in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.  How about a few million of a billionaire’s pocket change to defend – better, restore – democracy in the U.S.  of A?

Moreover, the “Hollywood Liberals” have not only the funds to support a progressive media.  They also have an abundance of promotional and performing talent. 

When Richard Nixon put himself above the law in his grab for extraordinary power, he was done in by a free press and an independent judiciary.  The regressive right, taking careful note of this, has consolidated and muffled the mainstream media (with a few honorable and courageous exceptions), and the GOP presidents since Nixon have packed the courts with like-minded judges.  Now, all that is left of a free and unconstrained media is the internet – for the moment, at least.  Don’t count on its survival.

And yet, despite the regressive right’s high-powered media propaganda machine, and the absence of an effective countering progressive media, scarcely a third of the population supports Bush or his war, and even less approve of Bush’s economic and social policies.   Approval of the GOP Congress is down to twenty points.   Likely voters in the coming election prefer a Democratic to a Republican Congress by almost twenty percentage points.  In an honest election, Democratic control of the House would be a near certainty, and of the Senate, very likely.

However, as I noted last week, my guess is that we will not have that Democratic Congress, due to the “privatization” of the elections and the consequent electronic vote fraud, combined with massive GOP efforts to disqualify Democratic voters.  What we will have is a very angry and energized public.

But who or what will give voice to this anger and dissent?

The regressive right has shown us how a determined, wealthy and privileged minority can gain political power and maintain it.  They planned for a long haul, building institutions and media, and the last six years have been payoff time.

The progressive (and in the authentic sense, the “conservative") majority has talent and resources.  So where is the action?  Where is the rebuttal to what David Brock calls “the Republican noise machine”?  Why has Air America Radio been allowed to wither on the vine?

On a related note: Is it time to give up on the Democratic Party?  Apparently a lot of progressives seem to think so, judging from what I have recently heard and read.  Many of these have said that they will either sit out this election or vote for a third party candidate.

I share this exasperation.  The Congressional Democrats have, for the most part, been very wimpy, and there is little reason to expect a forceful opposition if, by some miracle, the Dems take either house of Congress.  Even so, it’s nose-clip time.  The only available way for a disapproving public to halt this headlong rush into Fascism is to vote for the Democrats.  A massive turnout and protest vote against Bushism can make this next stolen election very costly to the GOP.  And who knows, it is just possible that a flood of protest votes might overwhelm the fraud.

But win or lose, the progressive majority must take a lesson from their opponents: they must take over a major party.  For decades, the regressives thrashed about uselessly, complaining about the moderate GOP and voting for various minority parties.  Then they got smart and took aim at the Republican party.

Similarly, it would be much easier to overthrow the DLC “republicrats” within the Democratic party than to build a viable national party from the ground up.  And if successful, the insurgent progressives would inherit an established and well-funded party organization.  In the meantime, we should target the Quislings in the primaries; namely, the Democrats who have supported the Iraq war, and those who voted for the Patriot Act and, last month, the “enabling" Military Commissions Act.

Yes, the established Democratic Party stinks.  But let’s not abandon the Party.   Instead, let’s fumigate it and then reconstruct it.

Copyright 2006 by Ernest Partridge


Ernest Partridge's Internet Publications

Conscience of a Progressive:  A book in progress. 

Partridge's Scholarly Publications. (The Online Gadfly)

Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in the field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. He has taught Philosophy at the University of California, and in Utah, Colorado and Wisconsin. He publishes the website, "The Online Gadfly" and co-edits the progressive website, "The Crisis Papers".   His e-mail is: gadfly@igc.org .

Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in the field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. He has taught Philosophy at the University of California, and in Utah, Colorado and Wisconsin. He publishes the website, "The Online Gadfly" (www.igc.org/gadfly) and co-edits the progressive website, "The Crisis Papers" (www.crisispapers.org).  Dr. Partridge can be contacted at: gadfly@igc.org .