SUCKER ECONOMICS
    By Ernest Partridge
    University of California, Riverside
    www.igc.org/gadfly // gadfly@igc.org 
     
    
      
        
          |  | "There's a Fool Born Every Minute."P. T. Barnum"Never Give a Sucker an Even Break."
W. C. Fields | 
      
     
  
	
Would you like to hear of a sure-fire way to win the State Lottery?
	It's really quite simple: 
	just don't play!
	Seriously! 
	Don't play, and you will gain real dollars in 
    your pocket: it is the cash that you don't have to pay in state taxes, 
    thanks to all the suckers that are throwing their money at the lottery.
	State lotteries, to put it bluntly, are regressive taxes on the poor and 
    the foolish. And they are a tax break to anyone with a rudimentary 
    understanding of the calculus of probability, and hence with the good sense 
    to abstain. In addition, the fortunate abstainers also gain a considerable 
    tax relief as a result of the state taxes on commercial gambling operations.
	The amounts of cash involved in state lotteries are considerable. Gross 
    receipts are reported at about $40 billion, and the total net income to the 
    states is reported from between $14 billion and $26 billion. (Salt Lake 
    Tribune, Aug. 11, 1998, Slate, September, 1996)
	Twenty-one years ago, only Nevada had casinos. Now they are in 26 states. 
    And lotteries are to be found in 37 states and the District of Columbia. 
    Only Utah, Tennessee and Hawaii are completely free of legalized gambling.
	As state employees from throughout the realm well know, the promises of 
    public windfalls from lottery earnings are about as reliable as private 
    expectations of lottery winnings. Payments to state institutions are 
    generally offset by reductions from tax revenues. This has been the case 
    with the higher education budgets in California.
	And those who feel they just must flirt with Lady Luck simply could not 
    make a worse choice than the state lotteries, which return in winnings about 
    half of what they take in. In contrast, the gaming tables and slot machines 
    in Nevada pay out well over 90% of the amounts wagered. So if you feel you 
    must throw away your money, by all means go to Vegas where at least you can 
    get a cheap meal and hotel room and enjoy the floor show while you and your 
    money are soon parted.
	Its quite bad enough that the states utilize lotteries to raise public 
    revenues. But it is far worse that the states promote their lotteries. Thus 
    the state governments, established to "serve and protect" their citizens, 
    become instead their exploiters – the state as public bookie, and a monopoly 
    bookie at that. There are myriad good reasons not to play the state 
    lotteries, as we noted above, but don't expect that as much as a dime of the 
    lottery earnings will ever be used to warn the citizens that they are being 
    "taken." It is the objective of lottery commissions to raise as much revenue 
    as possible, and not to look after the welfare of the citizens. During our 
    residence in the Midwest and California we have seen hundreds of promotional 
    ads for the state lotteries, and not, to our recollection, a single 
    "counter-commercial."
	And so, at a time when citizen distrust of government is reaching crisis 
    proportions, state governments are engaged in activities that were regarded 
    as criminal just a generation ago. If "Big Government" has any legitimate 
    role in our personal finances (and the libertarians, of course, insist that 
    it has none), then surely it should be to encourage us to use our personal 
    asserts prudently. The very last thing it should be doing is administering 
    and encouraging us to engage in the least prudent use thereof.
	Do many citizens believe the state-sponsored lottery promotions? 
    Apparently they do. According to a report from the Consumer Federation of 
    America, over a quarter of Americans see lotteries as their best bet for a 
    secure retirement. Moreover, the Federation reports, "those who are spending 
    the highest proportion of their incomes on lotteries tend to be low and 
    moderate income households." And forty percent of those with incomes less 
    than $35,000 see the lottery as their best chance for having $500,000 for 
    their retirement.   
	The social costs, a few decades hence, when this horde of luckless 
    gamblers reach retirement age stone broke, is horrible to contemplate.
	
    
		
Copyright 1999 by Ernest Partridge